Old Rules, New Evidence: Evidence Rules in AI Disputes & AI-Assisted & AI Generated Evidence
This webinar is provided free of charge to active judges through an NJC scholarship.
199
Days & Times
11 a.m. PDT/Noon MDT/1 p.m. CDT/2 p.m. EDT
Course Location
Online
Course Fees
This webinar is provided free of charge to active judges through an NJC scholarship.
$199
Courts are increasingly confronted with resolving disputes arising out of the use of artificial intelligence as well as determining the admissibility of evidence that has been shaped or created by artificial intelligence. To do so, judges must understand the basics of artificial intelligence and also the distinction between AI-assisted processing and AI-generated content. The purpose of this session is to outline the issues in both the cases in which the use of AI is the gravamen of the complaint and those cases in which AI-assisted or AI-generated materials are offered as exhibits or illustrative aids in the case.
This webinar is provided free of charge to active judges through an NJC scholarship. $199
During this course, you will learn to:
- Understand the basics of AI, GAI, and their corresponding vocabularies
- Differentiate between the likely uses of AI-assisted and AI-generated evidence in the courts
- Assess the basic legal principles that must be applied when the use of AI or GAI is the gravamen of the complaint
- Apply the existing evidence framework to determine whether materials and information that have been created or influenced by AI or GAI may be offered as exhibits or illustrative aids in court
- Analyze the need for tailored jury instructions in understanding and evaluating evidence involving AI
- Evaluate some suggested pattern jury instruction related to AI-based cases and AI-assisted or AI-generated evidence
Courts are increasingly confronted with resolving disputes arising out of the use of artificial intelligence as well as determining the admissibility of evidence that has been shaped or created by artificial intelligence. To do so, judges must understand the basics of artificial intelligence and also the distinction between AI-assisted processing and AI-generated content. The purpose of this session is to outline the issues in both the cases in which the use of AI is the gravamen of the complaint and those cases in which AI-assisted or AI-generated materials are offered as exhibits or illustrative aids in the case.